When invited to the Oct. 17th Gubernatorial debate, Rick Perry denied acceptance until the release of opponent Bill White's 1990's tax returns. Is this

Friday, December 10, 2010

re: Keep Texans Safe

Texas should enact sobriety checkpoints.

In reading Carleen's post, I have to admit that at first I was skeptical. I initially was fretting over whether or not the idea is good. I can only imagine how irritating it would be for sober drivers to go through the random checks, and additionally believe that sobriety checkpoints seem somewhat overbearing in a very "Big Brother" sort of way. Scott Henson couldn't have said it better.

That said, he did. Carleen's blog links to this page. In Henson's review of the issue, he points out some key things about the bill which subsequently reduced my hesitations. Carona's bill essentially states that each security checkpoint:
  • must be random
  • could not be a repeat location within 12 months
  • would be safe from unreasonable search/seizure (NO proof of ID or Insurance would be required unless there were probable cause) ((**I think this gets a little hairy because officers discretion is different**))
  • (check on the previous bullet) each encounter must be video recorded for 'quality assurance'
I looked a little bit further at the issue and came upon another interesting safety measure. Sobriety Checkpoints would only be required in
  • cities with populations exceeding 500,000
  • counties with populations exceeding 250,000
It is a certain truth that it would be cumbersome for all involved, however, its not as bad as it could be. MADD is pushing for even more restrictive legislation. They are pushing for legislation including
  • permanent revocation of second time drunk driving offenders
  • requirement of an ankle monitor for 60 days for first time offenders
When it gets that bad, I will sadly drink my last beer and move to California where the Grass is Greener.

No comments:

Post a Comment